紀元å‰. 緑豊ã‹ãªåœ°åŸŸã¯ã€, ã—ã‹ã—ã€ã™ã¹ã¦ãŒè‰¯ã„出æ¥ã‚‹
敬æ„を表ã—㦠アースデー, コー​​ãƒãƒ¬ãƒ¼ãƒˆãƒŠã‚¤ãƒ„ 雑誌 リリースã—ã¾ã—㟠“report card” measuring the “green rating” for each of Canada’s provinces and territories.
ブリティッシュコãƒãƒ³ãƒ“ア州ã¯ã€æœ€é«˜ä½ã«ãƒ©ãƒ³ã‚¯ã‚¤ãƒ³ スコアã®ã¨ 69% — a C+. Ontario was in second place 㧠67%, 㨠ノースウェスト準州ã®ç¬¬ä¸‰ã«æ¥ãŸ 㧠66%.
ã—ã‹ã—ã€Cã®æœ€ä¸Šä½ã‚°ãƒ¬ãƒ¼ãƒ‰ , even these high-ranking locations have plenty of room for improvement.
ã«ã‚ˆã‚‹ã¨ CBCニュースレãƒãƒ¼ãƒˆ ç ”ç©¶ä¸Šã®, 紀元å‰. scored particularly well in green jobs, green buildings, 自然食å“, and energy efficiency.
The rankings for the other regions were: ユーコン準州 57%, ヌナブト 56%, アルãƒãƒ¼ã‚¿å·ž 55%, ノãƒã‚¹ã‚³ã‚·ã‚¢å·ž 53%, ã¨ã‚µã‚¹ã‚«ãƒãƒ¥ãƒ¯ãƒ³å·ž 50%. Several provinces receiving “failing” grades, including Quebec 49%, マニトãƒå·ž 46%, ニューブランズウィック州 40%, ニューファンドランドラブラドール州 38%, and Prince Edward Island at 32%.
The provinces were scored on ten categories — Air, æ°´, 生物多様性, 人, 建物, 輸é€, 食ã¹ç‰©, 無駄, エãƒãƒ«ã‚®ãƒ¼, and Toxics — worth ten points each.
ã™ã‚‹ã“ã¨ãŒã§ãã¾ã™ read the full analysis, with an explanation of each category considered, ã“ã®ä¸ã§ コー​​ãƒãƒ¬ãƒ¼ãƒˆãƒŠã‚¤ãƒ„ special report.
Photo by aussiegall (Flickrã®)